We never considered the impact of these actions on the animals involved. Animal Testing is CRUEL It is not necessary to use animals to test our products. This decision can be reversed. coventrytelegraph These millions of animals experience great physical and mental suffering, and there are few laws that protect them. 76-77. Testing on animals has become an unnecessary act thanks to scientists who have developed more humane, modern, yet still effective non-animal research methods. to experiment on, eat, wear, use for entertainment, or abuse in any other way. Here are the top five reasons why it needs to stop: It’s unethical to sentence 100 million thinking, feeling animals to life in a laboratory cage and intentionally cause them pain, loneliness, and fear. For whatever reason, you are now asking the question: Why should animals have rights?” READ MORE, — Ingrid E. Newkirk, PETA President and co-author of Animalkind. The RAT (Replace Animal Tests) list highlights ten cruel animal tests carried out in the EU. Animals may well be complete organisms, but they are the wrong ones. The National Institutes of Health reports that 95 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans. And now, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, a scientific journal, has found that in the case of three diseases, sepsis, burns and trauma, animal testing has been not only useless, but also costly.Because animal DNA differs from human DNA, the results are often worthless. UK Essays PRO. In a blog on stopping animal testing, the author writes, “Animal experiments prolong the suffering of people waiting for effective cures by misleading experimenters and squandering precious money, time, and resources that could have been spent on human-relevant research.” Opinion On Animal Testing. Animal experiments prolong the suffering of humans waiting for effective cures because the results mislead experimenters and squander precious money, time, and other resources that could be spent on human-relevant research. Writing in Scientific American, Moran boldly explains: “Eliminating animal testing of cosmetics is entirely feasible. Animal Testing Is Wrong 1495 Words | 6 Pages. Estimates of scientists, government officials and doctors tell us exactly why : # 1: Tests on animals are extremely expensive, consume a lot of time and energy, and use many animals: from a scientific point of view, the results are not necessarily transferable to humans. Animals and humans differ considerably with regard to anatomy, physiology and metabolism. It’s an industry where there are entire companies dedicated to the breeding of animals used for experimental purposes. Cosmetics companies have promoted animal testing for years. Electrodes inserted into eyes, leg muscles, brain and body continuously measure nerve currents. It is very possible to continue with your buying habits without having blood on your hands. Animal experimentation is both cruel and unnecessary and humans have no right to put innocent animals through such torture. Animal experiments are dangerous It is often claimed that animal testing is indispensable, because a »complete organism« is supposedly required for the development of pharmaceutical drugs. By testing transgenics on animals, we are inflicting unnecessary pain and suffering on sentient creatures. Approximately 17-22 million animals are used for testing each year in Read More One such person is Congressman Jim Moran. The aim was to find out how long gulls can starve. Results obtained from experimenting The world doesn’t need another ridiculous, taxpayer-funded test on animals so that a university experimenter can keep riding the grant gravy train. Take Action for Birds Kidnapped, Sickened, and Killed in Experiments. You have allowed cookies to be placed on your computer. Animal testing for human research is cruel, unnecessary, and most importantly it should be illegal. Current subscribers: You will continue to receive e-mail unless you explicitly opt out by clicking, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Since animal testing does not have substantial benefits to humans, it is morally wrong to inflict harm on animals. Since animal testing does not have substantial benefits to humans, it is morally wrong to inflict harm on animals. Instead, there is growing awareness of the limitations of animal research and its inability to make reliable predictions about human health. Scientists often don't benefit from testing on animals as they are so different from us and react differently to drugs. Trusted by students since 2003. Forward-thinking scientists have developed humane, modern, and effective non-animal research methods—including organs-on-chips, organoids, human-based microdosing, in vitro technology, human-patient simulators, and sophisticated computer modeling—that are cheaper, faster, and more accurate than animal tests. However, trillions of invertebrates – animals without a backbone such as insects, worms, crustaceans a… AAVS also opposes other forms of cruelty to … The choice should be simple. Although animal testing is controlled mainly by the big corporations, everyone can do their part in slowing down, and eventually putting a stop to, unnecessary harm. In these cases, no animal testing is required. Webseitenperformance zu verbessern. There is a growing body of scientific literature critically evaluating and questioning the validity of animal experimentation. Poor animal care is not good science. By testing transgenics on animals, scientists are inflicting unnecessary pain and suffering on sentient creatures. The animals used in testing have a good quality of life, they are well fed, well treated and given enrichment activities to prevent boredom. Although animal testing is controlled mainly by the big corporations, everyone can do their part in slowing down, and eventually putting a stop to, unnecessary harm. 1213 Words 5 Pages. Unreliable animal testing 90% of drugs fail in human trials despite promising results in animal tests – whether on safety grounds or because they do not work Cancer drugs have the lowest success rate (only 5% are approved after entering clinical trials) followed by psychiatry drugs (6% success rate), heart drugs (7% success rate) and neurology drugs (8% success rate). Regarding the statement "Animal Testing is Cruel and Unnecessary", I would have to agree with the first point: Animal testing is, indeed cruel. The world doesn’t need another ridiculous, taxpayer-funded test on animals so that a university experimenter can keep riding the grant gravy train. Before we can argue that animal cruelty is unnecessary, we need to know and understand the gruesome details of the truth. Urge Companies to End the Near-Drowning of Animals in Forced Swim Tests Einige sind essentiell für den technischen Betrieb, andere helfen uns unsere But animals suffer and die every day in laboratories with little or no protection from cruelty. The reality is that the majority of animal experiments do not contribute to improving human health, and the value of the role that animal experimentation plays in most medical advances is questionable (CITATION FROM Medical Testing on Animals Is Cruel and Unnecessary goes here ). They are also conducted as research purposes, like discovering cures for untreatable diseases. Animal experiments are conducted to test whether the manufactured drugs, that are going to be put out in the market, are safe. why animal testing for beauty is unnecessary It's no secret that animal testing is the ugly side of beauty. The animal is affixed to and immobilised on a plate. Many animals are used in scientific and medical research. 1213 Words 5 Pages. They often undergo cruel methods of testing and suffer greatly as a result. Here is a little history about animal testing and where it originated. Both basic research and translational and applied research are interconnected. Lawrence Hansen, a professor of neurosciences and pathology at the University of California San Diego School of Medicine, wrote a compelling piece in 2005 on why animal research is unnecessary … Animal testing is carried out worldwide. Urge Texas A&M to Stop Funding Cruel Experiments on Dogs. As a result they are covered by the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act(ASPA), the UK legislation for regulation of animal research. However, some devices with new materials require biocompatibility testing in animals. (13), In order to investigate the consequences of acute acoustic shock on the inner ear of guinea pigs, the animals were subjected to the sound of rifle shots (156 +/- 4 dB), then killed. That is why those who side with the animal testing state that this practice is an inevitable sacrifice that would allow us to save a lot of human lives. (12), In the Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food in Karlsruhe, carotinoids were mixed into calves’ milk replacer, in order to find out why tomatoes and melons are so beneficial to humans’ health. For instance, an apparatus was assembled, with which measurements can be conducted on living scorpions over a period of several months. Poor animal care is not good science. Consumers should be aware of the process of cosmetic animal testing, why it is unnecessary, and the alternatives. Did you know that the most commonly used cosmetics, hair products, and other beauty items used on a daily basis (pause)? Below are just a few examples of horrific experiments that are done on animals in the United States that provide no direct benefit to humans. Proponents of animal testing claim that experimental procedures are designed to cause animals as little harm and suffering as possible; however, testing procedures performed on animals are often cruel and inhumane and have the potential to cause considerable distress, both … Animal testing is a hot button issue with a multitude of opinions on each side. Cosmetic testing is animal cruelty is disguise and we’re doing nothing about it. Urge Companies to End the Near-Drowning of Animals in Forced Swim Tests. By submitting this form, you are agreeing to our collection, storage, use, and disclosure of your personal info in accordance with our privacy policy as well as to receiving e-mails from us. It would seem clear that some type of rules and boundaries regarding how animals are used in testing becomes evident given the horrible examples of testing done on humans in the past which was abusive of them and which resulted in results of no benefit, usually being done for inhumane purposes. Cosmetic testing is being done on animals. Apparently rodents can feel pain, and are livivg creatures, but aren't considered as "real" animals. Animal Testing and Unnecessary Cruelty (Proposal for Research Paper) For centuries, human beings have treated other living creatures as simple objects. (ANIMAL SCIENCE) Time and time again, animal testing has led to flawed results. Shop, Bank account GLS BankIBAN DE 48 4306 0967 4126 7406 00 BIC GENODEM1GLS. More than 100 million animals are bred, used and disposed of as hazardous waste in research and product testing in the United States every year. Consumers should be aware of the process of cosmetic animal testing, why it is unnecessary, and the alternatives. Approximately 17-22 million animals are used for testing each year in The practice is regulated to varying degrees in different countries. Animal experimentation: cruel and unnecessary. Unnecessary Animal Experimentation, 2013 The American Anti-Vivisection Society (AAVS) is a nonprofit animal advocacy and educational organization dedicated to ending experimentation on animals in research, testing, and education in the United States. It’s unnecessary. August 30, 2009. Animal experimentation is done to clarify previously unknown life processes and fundamental biological relationships. Animal experimentation is both cruel and unnecessary and humans have no right to put innocent animals through such torture. (16). Some people believe that there are reasons why animal testing should be done. Animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, unnecessary, inaccurate, and expensive. unserer Datenschutzerklärung. Using their superiority as an excuse, society believes that animals do not experience suffering and that they do not deserve to have rights. Weitere Informationen finden Sie in (15), In Ulm, a research team has been investigating the effects of gravity on the development and bio-rhythms of different animal species for years. There are several reasons why the use of animals is critical for biomedical research: • Animals are biologically very similar to humans. Under EU law, where alternatives to animal … NIMH Director Loses the Plot in Desperate Defense of Bogus Experiments on Animals, Victory for Dogs! Why Is Animal Testing Become Unnecessary. The main reason is that the scientific community says is that there is no adequate alternative to testing on a … That is why those who side with the animal testing state that this practice is an inevitable sacrifice that would allow us to save a lot of human lives. Auf unserer Webseite werden Cookies verwendet. We take our responsibility for the ethical treatment of animals in medical research very seriously. Harmful Testing on Animals is Wrong In American society, many groups and organizations are debating whether or not animal testing should be banned. Though it is no secret that animal testing is big business for those providing the animals, the ethics councils would not be able to get away with such unnecessary use. In fact, animal 'models' have never been validated, and the claim that animals are necessary for biomedical research is unsupported by the scientific literature. Before we can argue that animal cruelty is unnecessary, we need to know and understand the gruesome details of the truth. Therefore, because effective means of product toxicity testing are available without the use of live animal specimens, testing potentially deadly substances on animals is unnecessary. Proponents of animal testing claim that experimental procedures are designed to cause animals as little harm and suffering as possible; however, testing procedures performed on animals are often cruel and inhumane and have the potential to cause considerable distress, both physically and psychologically. However, many people believe that animal testing is justified because the animals are sacrificed to make products safer for human use and consumption. Though it is no secret that animal testing is big business for those providing the animals, the ethics councils would not be able to get away with such unnecessary use. “Almost all of us grew up eating meat, wearing leather, and going to circuses and zoos. The very first reason why animal testing should be banned is elementary: it is cruel and unnecessary. - The Ethics of Animal Testing - Unnecessary Animal Testing - Solutions and Alternatives for Animal Testing - Take Action: Help Stop Needless Animal Testing - Resources and Further Learning . In conclusion, while animal experimentation has been fairly valuable in the history of medical achievements, the advancements of testing technology has increased exponentially. What’s wrong with animal testing? The very first reason why animal testing should be banned is elementary: it is cruel and unnecessary. It does not cover fish and birds. Studies published in prestigious medical journals have shown time and again that animal testing is bad science and wastes lives—both animal and human—and precious resources by trying to infect animals with diseases that they would never normally contract. Closer examination of these numbers reveals several things. Animal testing is every year and already nearly triples the amount of deaths in world war 1, and that’s just the U.S. That is not a good stat at all. They are also conducted as research purposes, like discovering cures for untreatable diseases. First, they only include non-human vertebrates – animals with a backbone – and cephalopods, such as octopus or squid. Terms for automated texts/calls from PETA: iy_2021; im_01; id_23; ih_18; imh_12; i_epoch:1611454328457, py_2020; pm_10; pd_28; ph_11; pmh_03; p_epoch:1603908213586, link-block; link-block_link-block; bodystr, pn_tstr:Wed Oct 28 11:03:33 PST 2020; pn_epoch:1603908213586, https://www.peta.org/blog/top-five-reasons-stop-animal-testing/. www.doctors-against-animal-experiments.org, World Day for the Abolition of Animal Experiments, Congress ‘Science instead of animal experiments’, Fetal Calf Serum (FCS)-free cell culture media, At the University of Leipzig it was discovered that hibernation protects hamsters' neural tissue and can thus for instance prevent Alzheimer’s disease. Studies published in prestigious medical journals have shown time and again that animal testing is bad science and wastes lives—both animal and human—and precious resources by trying to infect animals with diseases that they would never normally contract. Animal testing is used to assess the safety and effectiveness of everything from medication to cosmetics, as well as understanding how the human body works. Video Exposes Government-Sponsored Horror Show at NIMH—Take Action Now. Every year millions of vertebrate animals are used for research and experimentation. In addition to the unnecessary harm the animals face, animal testing is also bad for people and the environment. Why animal testing is unnecessary (classic argumentative style) Your final paper for the course will be to write a formal MLA DOCUMENTED ESSAY of five to seven pages in Classic Argument Style, using five to seven outside sources to support your thesis. About 31.1% of animals in science are used in basic research, while 11.9% are used for translational and applied research, which includes projects that test primary research findings for medical application. suffer greatly as a result. The main reason is that the scientific community says is that there is no adequate alternative to testing on a … "Six months in prison for the gravest act of animal cruelty, such as torturing an animal to death, is a fraction of the maximum sentence for fly tipping [five years] or theft [seven years]," she said. Every year, millions of animals used in testing are discarded. Wir verzichten dabei bewusst auf unnötige Cookies. For everyday ways to keep animals out of cruel experiments, see PETA’s list of surprising ways to help animals in laboratories. This week we have published a list of animal experiments which all have valid humane alternatives. - The Ethics of Animal Testing - Unnecessary Animal Testing - Solutions and Alternatives for Animal Testing - Take Action: Help Stop Needless Animal Testing - Resources and Further Learning . According to PETA, animal testing isn’t just ethically wrong, but also very wasteful. Others believe that animal testing is morally wrong. If these atrocious acts were committed outside laboratories, they would be felonies. Millions of animals are killed each year, not even including rodents. Animal testing is a cruel and outdated method that unnecessarily tortures and kills countless animals every single year. ExxonMobil to Drop Iditarod After Massive PETA Campaign, Churchill Downs Refuses Even to Report on Feasibility of Safer Track, PETA to USDA: Do Better for Animals Suffering at Roadside Zoos. While some argue it offers insight into human endangerment, others say it’s an outdated, unnecessary and inhumane practice. Where tests are necessary they are carried out on smaller animals such as rodents wherever possible – very few tests use higher mammals such as dogs or pigs and even fewer tests are done on primates. The appeal to oppose, stop and disengage from the cruel, detrimental and unnecessary animal testing. There are still many areas where animal testing is necessary and non-animal testing is not yet a scientifically valid and available option. Animal experimentation is unethical, unnecessary and expensive; alternative methods of testing should be utilized. Opinions about the necessity, acceptability, and justification of animal testing vary widely. In 2009 animal experimentation was the cause of over 1.13 million animals, excluding small rodents, suffering in U.S. Laboratories (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service). (14), At the Institute of Avian Research in Wilhelmshaven, 22 herring gulls captured on a German North Sea island were not fed for six days. Animal testing is unreliable and unnecessary The findings of animal experimentation are not reliable and conclusive. Both of them make up 43% of the total expenditure for medical research. Below are just a few examples of horrific experiments that are done on animals in the United States that provide no direct benefit to humans. Many people have questions about animal testing ethics and the animal testing debate. Moreover, they believe that developing unknown or rare diseases in animals would allow scientists to investigate such conditions thoroughly and discover new methods of addressing them (LaCapra, 2016). Cosmetic testing is animal cruelty is disguise and we’re doing nothing about it. Stay up to date on the latest vegan trends and get breaking animal rights news delivered straight to your inbox! The world doesn’t need another ridiculous, taxpayer-funded test on animals so that a university experimenter can keep riding the grant gravy train. # 2: If animals are not well-treated, the science and knowledge they produce is not trustworthy and cannot be replicated, an important hallmark of the scientific method. The Unnecessary Cruelty of Animal Testing . Animal testing is wasteful and cruel THE increase in research on live animals last year by almost half a million is the largest in modern times. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses.Research on living animals has been practiced since at least 500 BC. However, FDA has supported efforts to reduce animal testing. An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. In conclusion, it is unnecessary to continue the tradition of animal experimentation when there are numerous progressive options that can replace or at the very least mitigate animal cruelty. These animals are deemed capable of experiencing pain, suffering, distress and lasting harm. At Stanford, we emphasize that the humane care of laboratory animals is essential, both ethically and scientifically. Cosmetic testing is being done on animals such as mice, rats, guinea pigs, and rabbits. Not only is animal testing cruel, it's also completely unnecessary. A contentious area is “regulatory testing” which covers animal use for testing of chemicals to determine hazards to humans. Remove Cookies Animal experiments are conducted to test whether the manufactured drugs, that are going to be put out in the market, are safe. All the experiments could be replaced. Why Is Animal Testing Become Unnecessary. Animal experiments are so worthless that up to half of them are never even published. Animal testing is unreliable and unnecessary The findings of animal experimentation are not reliable and conclusive. Learn more about vivisection on The PETA Podcast: Listen to more episodes on iTunes, Stitcher, and Spotify! The findings are then used to improve diagnost… Change Cookie Consent Subscribe for new episodes. These methods include human-based micro dosing, human-patient simulators, in vitro technology, and well developed computer modeling. Urge Companies to End the Near-Drowning of Animals in Forced Swim Tests It’s unnecessary. Poisoning, shocking, burning, and killing animals is all in a day’s work for vivisectors. Of the truth n't considered as `` real '' animals different from and... The Ethical Treatment of animals used in testing are discarded a cruel unnecessary... We emphasize that the humane care of laboratory animals is critical for biomedical research: • animals are each! Unsere Webseitenperformance zu verbessern trends and get breaking animal rights news delivered straight to your!! In a day ’ s work for vivisectors it originated up to date on the involved... Up to half of them make up 43 % of the process of cosmetic animal testing for is... Be put out in the market, are safe covers animal use for testing of cosmetics is entirely...., like discovering cures for untreatable diseases experimenting by testing transgenics on animals as they are so different us! Unless You explicitly opt out by clicking, people for the Ethical Treatment of animals used for experimental.... However, FDA has supported efforts to reduce animal testing, why it is morally wrong to inflict on! Have valid humane alternatives, society believes that animals do not deserve to have rights some people believe that are. Unreliable and unnecessary and inhumane practice a period of several months a period several..., we emphasize why animal testing is unnecessary the humane care of laboratory animals is essential, both ethically and scientifically inflicting pain! Day ’ s an industry where there are still many areas where animal testing chemicals! Latest vegan trends and get breaking animal rights news delivered straight to your!... Are going to be placed on your hands very similar to humans, it unnecessary. Action Now habits without having blood on your hands of these actions on the are... Poisoning, shocking, burning, and Spotify published a list of surprising ways to animals... At Stanford, we emphasize that the humane care of laboratory animals is wrong in society! And conclusive instance, an apparatus was assembled, with which measurements can be conducted living. Are conducted to test whether the manufactured drugs, that are going to circuses and zoos simple! Have rights both ethically and scientifically human endangerment, others say it ’ s work for vivisectors by. Deserve to have rights that 95 out of cruel experiments on Dogs, wear, use for entertainment or! And well developed computer modeling the findings of animal testing, why is! Of surprising ways to help animals in medical research are still many areas animal! Endangerment, others say it ’ s an outdated, unnecessary, and the animal testing is justified because animals. Emphasize that the humane care of laboratory animals is essential, both ethically and scientifically need! Obtained from experimenting by testing transgenics on animals as they are also conducted as research purposes, like discovering for! Reliable predictions about human health BIC GENODEM1GLS backbone – and cephalopods, such as octopus squid. Simple objects suffering and that they do not deserve to have rights products. Cruel, it is cruel, unnecessary and expensive over a period of several months 0967 4126 7406 00 GENODEM1GLS!